Paper detail

Research of the HIP 18856 binary system

The results of the study of the binary HIP 18856 and construction of its orbit are presented. New observational data obtained at the BTA of SAO RAS in 2007-2019. Earlier Cvetkovi'c et al. (2016) constructed orbit for this system. However, it is based on 6 measurements, which cover a small part of the orbit. The positional parameters of the Hipparcos (ESA 1997) astrometric satellite, published speckle interferometric data (Mason et al. 1999; Balega et al. 2006, 2007; Horch et al. 2012, 2017) and new ones were used in this study. Based on the new orbital parameters, the mass sum was calculated, and the physical parameters of the components were found. The obtained orbital and fundamental parameters were compared with the data from the study by Cvetkovi'c et al. (2016). The comparison shows that the new orbital solution is better than the old one, since it fits new observational data accurately. Also based on the qualitative grade performed by Worley & Heintz (1983) new orbit was classified as "reliable", which means data covering more than half of the orbit with sufficient quantities of residuals of measurements.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.