Paper detail

Representing Brain Anatomical Regularity and Variability by Few-Shot Embedding

Effective representation of brain anatomical architecture is fundamental in understanding brain regularity and variability. Despite numerous efforts, it is still difficult to infer reliable anatomical correspondence at finer scale, given the tremendous individual variability in cortical folding patterns. It is even more challenging to disentangle common and individual patterns when comparing brains at different neuro-developmental stages. In this work, we developed a novel learning-based few-shot embedding framework to encode the cortical folding patterns into a latent space represented by a group of anatomically meaningful embedding vectors. Specifically, we adopted 3-hinge (3HG) network as the substrate and designed an autoencoder-based embedding framework to learn a common embedding vector for each 3HG's multi-hop feature: each 3HG can be represented as a combination of these feature embeddings via a set of individual specific coefficients to characterize individualized anatomical information. That is, the regularity of folding patterns is encoded into the embeddings, while the individual variations are preserved by the multi=hop combination coefficients. To effectively learn the embeddings for the population with very limited samples, few-shot learning was adopted. We applied our method on adult HCP and pediatric datasets with 1,000+ brains (from 34 gestational weeks to young adult). Our experimental results show that: 1) the learned embedding vectors can quantitatively encode the commonality and individuality of cortical folding patterns; 2) with the embeddings we can robustly infer the complicated many-to-many anatomical correspondences among different brains and 3) our model can be successfully transferred to new populations with very limited training samples.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.