Paper detail

Representative Scenarios to Capture Renewable Generation Stochasticity and Cross-Correlations

Generating representative scenarios for power system planning in which the stochasticity of renewable generation and cross-correlations between renewables and load are fully captured, is a challenging problem. Traditional methods for scenario generation often fail to generate diverse scenarios that include both seasonal (frequently occurring) and atypical (extreme) days required for planning purposes. This paper presents a methodical approach to generate representative scenarios. It also proposes new metrics that are more relevant for evaluating the generated scenarios from an applications perspective. When applied to historical data from a power utility, the proposed approach resulted in scenarios that included a good mix of seasonal and atypical days. The results also demonstrated pertinence of the proposed cluster validation metrics. Finally, the paper presents a trade-off for determining optimal number of scenarios for a given application.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.