Paper detail

Reply to arXiv:1006.2126 by Giovanni Amelino-Camelia et al

It was previously shown that models with deformations of special relativity that have an energy-dependent yet observer-independent speed of light suffer from nonlocal effects that are in conflict with observation to very high precision. In a recent preprint it has been claimed that this conclusion is false. This claim was made by writing down expressions for modified Lorentz-transformations the use of which does not reproduce the result. I will show here that the failure to reproduce the result is not a consequence of a novel and improved calculation, but a consequence of repeating the same calculation but making an assumption that is in conflict with the assumptions made to produce the original scenario. I will here explain what the physical meaning of either assumption is and why the original assumption is the physically meaningful one. I will then further explain why even making the differing assumption does not remove but merely shift the problem and why the bound derived by Amelino-Camelia et al is wrong.