Paper detail

Reply to 'A Comment on '"The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization" - the Case for Interstellar Space Probes'

Reply to A Comment on The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization - the Case for Interstellar Space Probess by Ian Crawford. The paper The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization resulted from the collective work of TE-SAT, a team appointed by ESA in 2003 to assess a strategy to find and characterize Terrestrial Exoplanets. The interstellar flight aspect was not part of the TE-SAT work and was added afterward as side remarks in the chapter on « The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization ». As an introductory general remark, the intention of the paper was not to discourage work on interstellar flight prospective. On the contrary, any advance in this field that makes interstellar travel closer to us is welcome. In the framework of this short reply, the discussion can only be qualitative; it would deserve a full future paper.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.