Paper detail

Replacing spectral techniques for expander ratio, normalized cut and conductance by combinatorial flow algorithms

Several challenging problem in clustering, partitioning and imaging have traditionally been solved using the "spectral technique". These problems include the normalized cut problem, the graph expander ratio problem, the Cheeger constant problem and the conductance problem. These problems share several common features: all seek a bipartition of a set of elements; the problems are formulated as a form of ratio cut; the formulation as discrete optimization is shown here to be equivalent to a quadratic ratio, sometimes referred to as the Raleigh ratio, on discrete variables and a single sum constraint which we call the balance or orthogonality constraint; when the discrete nature of the variables is disregarded, the continuous relaxation is solved by the spectral method. Indeed the spectral relaxation technique is a dominant method providing an approximate solution to these problems. We propose an algorithm for these problems which involves a relaxation of the orthogonality constraint only. This relaxation is shown here to be solved optimally, and in strongly polynomial time, in O(mn log((n^2) / m) for a graph on $n$ nodes and $m$ edges. The algorithm, using HPF (Hochbaum's Pseudo-Flow) as subroutine, is efficient enough to be used to solve these bi-partitioning problems on millions of elements and more than 300 million edges within less than 10 minutes. It is also demonstrated, via a preliminary experimental study, that the results of the combinatorial algorithm proposed often improve dramatically on the quality of the results of the spectral method.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.