Paper detail

Repairing Activity Start Times to Improve Business Process Simulation

Business Process Simulation (BPS) is a common technique to estimate the impact of business process changes, e.g. what would be the cycle time of a process if the number of traces increases? The starting point of BPS is a business process model annotated with simulation parameters (a BPS model). Several studies have proposed methods to automatically discover BPS models from event logs -- extracted from enterprise information systems -- via process mining techniques. These approaches model the processing time of each activity based on the start and end timestamps recorded in the event log. In practice, however, it is common that the recorded start times do not precisely reflect the actual start of the activities. For example, a resource starts working on an activity, but its start time is not recorded until she/he interacts with the system. If not corrected, these situations induce waiting times in which the resource is considered to be free, while she/he is actually working. To address this limitation, this article proposes a technique to identify the waiting time previous to each activity instance in which the resource is actually working on them, and repair their start time so that they reflect the actual processing time. The idea of the proposed technique is that, as far as simulation is concerned, an activity instance may start once it is enabled and the corresponding resource is available. Accordingly, for each activity instance, the proposed technique estimates the activity enablement and the resource availability time based on the information available in the event log, and repairs the start time to include the non-recorded processing time. An empirical evaluation involving eight real-life event logs shows that the proposed approach leads to BPS models that closely reflect the temporal dynamics of the process.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.