Paper detail

Repair Locality with Multiple Erasure Tolerance

In distributed storage systems, erasure codes with locality $r$ is preferred because a coordinate can be recovered by accessing at most $r$ other coordinates which in turn greatly reduces the disk I/O complexity for small $r$. However, the local repair may be ineffective when some of the $r$ coordinates accessed for recovery are also erased. To overcome this problem, we propose the $(r,δ)_c$-locality providing $δ-1$ local repair options for a coordinate. Consequently, the repair locality $r$ can tolerate $δ-1$ erasures in total. We derive an upper bound on the minimum distance $d$ for any linear $[n,k]$ code with information $(r,δ)_c$-locality. For general parameters, we prove existence of the codes that attain this bound when $n\geq k(r(δ-1)+1)$, implying tightness of this bound. Although the locality $(r,δ)$ defined by Prakash et al provides the same level of locality and local repair tolerance as our definition, codes with $(r,δ)_c$-locality are proved to have more advantage in the minimum distance. In particular, we construct a class of codes with all symbol $(r,δ)_c$-locality where the gain in minimum distance is $Ω(\sqrt{r})$ and the information rate is close to 1.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.