Paper detail

Reorienting Our Perspective of Broad Absorption Line Quasars

New multi-frequency radio observations of a large sample of radio-selected BAL quasars, along with a very well matched sample of normal quasars, are presented. The observations were made one immediately after the other at 4.9 and 8.4 GHz with the goal of measuring the radio spectral index of each source. We have identified, for the first time, a significant difference in the spectral index distributions of BAL versus non-BAL quasars, with BAL sources showing an overabundance of steep-spectrum sources. This is the first direct observation suggesting that BAL quasars are more likely to be seen farther from the radio jet axis, although a range of orientations is needed to explain the width of the distribution. Utilizing a few different relationships between spectral index and viewing angle, we have also performed Monte-Carlo simulations to quantify the viewing angle to these sources. We find that the difference in the distributions of spectral index can be explained by allowing the BAL sources to have viewing angles extending about 10 degrees farther from the jet axis than non-BAL quasars.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.