Paper detail

Rényi Information Complexity and an Information Theoretic Characterization of the Partition Bound

We introduce a new information-theoretic complexity measure $IC_\infty$ for 2-party functions which is a lower-bound on communication complexity, and has the two leading lower-bounds on communication complexity as its natural relaxations: (external) information complexity ($IC$) and logarithm of partition complexity ($\text{prt}$), which have so far appeared conceptually quite different from each other. $IC_\infty$ is an external information complexity measure based on Rényi mutual information of order infinity. In the definition of $IC_\infty$, relaxing the order of Rényi mutual information from infinity to 1 yields $IC$, while $\log \text{prt}$ is obtained by replacing protocol transcripts with what we term "pseudotranscripts," which omits the interactive nature of a protocol, but only requires that the probability of any transcript given the inputs $x$ and $y$ to the two parties, factorizes into two terms which depend on $x$ and $y$ separately. Further understanding $IC_\infty$ might have consequences for important direct-sum problems in communication complexity, as it lies between communication complexity and information complexity. We also show that applying both the above relaxations simultaneously to $IC_\infty$ gives a complexity measure that is lower-bounded by the (log of) relaxed partition complexity, a complexity measure introduced by Kerenidis et al. (FOCS 2012). We obtain a sharper connection between (external) information complexity and relaxed partition complexity than Kerenidis et al., using an arguably more direct proof.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.