Paper detail

Renormalization Scheme Dependence in b->u Semileptonic Decays

After reviewing how the renormalization group equation can be used to sum logarithmic corrections to the decay rate for the semi-leptonic process b->u when using minimal subtraction, we consider renormalization scheme dependence for this calculation when employing this renor- malization scheme. In this calculation, an ambiguity resides in the running strong coupling and in the running b quark mass. The ambiguity usually associated with the renormalization mass scale mu is shown to cancel. It is demonstrated how in one renormalization scheme, there are only leading-log contributions to this decay rate. Another choice of renormalization scheme results in the decay rate being expressed in terms of the two-loop contribution to the beta-function associated with the strong coupling and the one-loop contribution to the anomalous mass dimension as well as a set of renormalization scheme invariant parameters.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.