Paper detail

Renormalization Scheme Dependence in a QCD Cross Section

The zero to four loop contribution to the cross section $R_{e^{+}e^{-}}$ for $e^{+}e^{-} \longrightarrow$ hadrons, when combined with the renormalization group equation, allows for summation of all leading-log ($LL$), next-to-leading-log $(NLL) \ldots N^3LL$ perturbative contributions. It is also shown how all logarithmic contributions to $R_{e^{+}e^{-}}$ can be summed and that $R_{e^{+}e^{-}}$ can be expressed in terms of the log independent contributions, and once this is done the running coupling $a$ is evaluated at a point independent of the renormalization scale $μ$. All explicit dependence of $R_{e^{+}e^{-}}$ on $μ$ cancels against its implicit dependence on $μ$ through the running coupling $a$ so that the ambiguity associated with the value of $μ$ is shown to disappear. The renormalization scheme dependency of the "summed" cross section $R_{e^{+}e^{-}}$ is examined in three distinct renormalization schemes. In each case, $R_{e^{+}e^{-}}$ is expressible in terms of renormalization scheme independent parameters $τ_i$ and is explicitly and implicitly independent of the renormalization scale $μ$. Two of the forms are then compared graphically both with each other and with the purely perturbative results and the $RG$-summed $N^3LL$ results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.