Paper detail

Renormalization of $\langleϕ^2\rangle$ at the inner horizon of rotating, accreting black holes

Classically, the inner horizon of a perturbed, rotating black hole undergoes an instability known as mass inflation, wherein the spacetime curvature diverges as a result of hyper-relativistic crossing streams of ingoing and outgoing radiation. The generic outcome of this instability is currently believed to be a strong, spacelike singularity, potentially alongside a weak, null singularity surviving at late times. However, the quantum back-reaction in this regime has yet to be fully calculated for a realistic black hole spacetime. Here we consider a massless quantized scalar field $ϕ$ over the inflationary Kasner spacetime, a recently developed model for the inner horizon geometry of a rotating, accreting black hole. With this spacetime, we use numerical adiabatic regularization to calculate $\langleϕ^2\rangle_\text{ren}$, the renormalized coincidence limit of the two-point correlation function, as a pointer to the behavior of the quantum stress-energy tensor. $\langleϕ^2\rangle_\text{ren}$ is generically found to be nonzero near the inner horizon, divergent where the curvature classically diverges, and larger for smaller black hole spins or accretion rates.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.