Paper detail

Renormalization of a one-parameter family of piecewise isometries

We consider a one-parameter family of piecewise isometries of a rhombus. The rotational component is fixed, and its coefficients belong to the quadratic number field $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$. The translations depend on a parameter $s$ which is allowed to vary in an interval. We investigate renormalizability. We show that recursive constructions of first-return maps on a suitable sub-domain eventually produce a scaled-down replica of this domain, but with a renormalized parameter $r(s)$. The renormalization map $r$ is the second iterate of a map $f$ of the generalised Lüroth type (a piecewise-affine version of Gauss' map). We show that exact self-similarity corresponds to the eventually periodic points of $f$, and that such parameter values are precisely the elements of the field $K$ that lie in the given interval. The renormalization process is organized by a graph. There are ten distinct renormalization scenarios corresponding to as many closed circuits in the graph. The process of induction along some of these circuits involves intermediate maps undergoing, as the parameter varies, infinitely many bifurcations. Our proofs rely on computer-assistance.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.