Renormalization Mass Scale and Scheme Dependence in the Perturbative Contribution to Inclusive Semileptonic bb Decays

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Abstract

We examine the perturbative calculation of the inclusive semi-leptonic decay rate ΓΓ for the bb-quark, using mass-independent renormalization. To finite order of perturbation theory the series for ΓΓ will depend on the unphysical renormalization scale parameter μμ and on the particular choice of mass-independent renormalization scheme; these dependencies will only be removed after summing the series to all orders. In this paper we show that all explicit μμ-dependence of ΓΓ, through powers of ln(μ)(μ), can be summed by using the renormalization group equation. We then find that this explicit μμ-dependence can be combined together with the implicit μμ-dependence of ΓΓ (through powers of both the running coupling a(μ)a(μ) and the running bb-quark mass m(μ)m(μ)) to yield a μμ-independent perturbative expansion for ΓΓ in terms of a(μ)a(μ) and m(μ)m(μ) both evaluated at a renormalization scheme independent mass scale I ⁣ ⁣MI\!\!M which is fixed in terms of either the "MS‾\overline{MS} mass" m‾b\overline{m}_b of the bb quark or its pole mass mpolem_{pole}. At finite order the resulting perturbative expansion retains a degree of arbitrariness associated with the particular choice of mass-independent renormalization scheme. We use the coefficients cic_i and gig_i of the perturbative expansions of the renormalization group functions β(a)β(a) and γ(a)γ(a), associated with a(μ)a(μ) and m(μ)m(μ) respectively, to characterize the remaining renormalization scheme arbitrariness of ΓΓ. We further show that all terms in the expansion of ΓΓ can be written in terms of the cic_i and gig_i coefficients and a set of renormalization scheme independent parameters τiτ_i.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.