Paper detail

Renormalization in Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac Equation, Describing Radiation Force in Classical Electrodynamics (in Russian)

While he derived the equation for the radiation force, Dirac (1938) mentioned a possibility to use different choices for the 4-momentum of an emitting electron. Particularly, the 4-momentum could be non-colinear to the electron 4-velocity. This ambiguity in the electron 4-momentum allows us to assume that the mass of emitting electron may be an operator, or, at least, a 4-tensor instead of being the usually assumed scalar, which relates the 4-velocity of a bare charge to the total momentum of a dressed point electron, the latter being a total of the momentum of the bare electron and that of the own electromagnetic field. On applying the re-normalization procedure to the mass operator, we arrive at an interesting dichotomy. The first choice (more close to traditional one) ensures the radiation force to be orthogonal to the 4-velocity. In this way the re-normalization results in the Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac equation or in the Eliezer equation. However, the 4-momentum of electron in this case is not well defined: the equality in the relativistic entity (E/c)^2=m^2c^2+p^2 appears to be broken and even the energy is not definite positive. The latter is an underlying reason for the 'run-away' solution. The other choice is to require the radiation force to be orthogonal to the 4-momentum (not to the 4-velocity). In this case the energy and momentum are well-defined and obey the relationship (E/c)^2=m^2c^2+p^2. Remarkably, the equations of a particle's motion in this case differ significantly from all the known versions. They appear to be well founded. They are simple, easy to solve, and can be applied to simulate the particle motion in the focus of an ultra-bright laser.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.