Paper detail

Renormalization Group Running of the Parity Operator in Lorentz-Violating Quantum Field Theory

In conventional relativistic quantum field theory, the discrete operators $\textbf{C}$, $\textbf{P}$, and $\textbf{T}$ are matrix operators with no renormalization scale dependence. However, in a Lorentz-violating theory with a fermion $f^μ$ term in the action, these operators may acquire nontrivial renormalization group behavior. Because the $f^μ$ term may actually be exchanged in the action for an equivalent $c^{νμ}$ term, the scale dependence depends explicitly on the renormalization scheme, even at one-loop order. The scheme dependence means it is always possible to set the scale dependence parameter $1-X$ to zero, but for analyses of some high-energy electron-photon processes, using a scheme with $X=0-$and thus definite scale dependences for $\textbf{C}$, $\textbf{P}$, and $\textbf{T}-$may nonetheless be more convenient.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.