Paper detail

Renormalization Group Effects in the Process $H \longrightarrow γγ$

The partial Higgs width $Γ(H \longrightarrow γγ)$ is important at the LHC for Higgs masses in the MSSM mass window up to 140 GeV as a relatively background free signal of a fundamental scalar. At the photon photon mode at the NLC it would be the Higgs production mechanism . Two loop QCD corrections exist for the fermionic contribution and in the case of the bottom loop large non-Sudakov double logarithms can be resummed to all orders and contribute up to 12 % compared to the t-quark. In more complicated Higgs sectors, such as in the MSSM, large $\tan β$ enhancements of bottom type Yukawa couplings can potentially dominate even the whole partial width. A main uncertainty in all existing calculations is the scale of the strong coupling as it is only renormalized at the three loop level. In this paper we include the exact two loop running coupling to all orders into the bottom contribution. We find that the effective scale is close to $α_s (10 m_b^2)$.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.