Paper detail

Renormalisation of hierarchically interacting Cannings processes

The present paper brings a new class of interacting jump processes into focus. We start from a single-colony $C^Λ$-process, which arises as the continuum-mass limit of a $Λ$-Cannings individual-based population model, where $Λ$ is a finite non-negative measure that describes the offspring mechanism. After that we introduce a system of hierarchically interacting $C^Λ$-processes, where the interaction comes from migration and reshuffling-resampling based on measures $(Λ_k)_{k}$ both acting in $k$-blocks of the hierarchical group. We refer to this system as the $C_N^{c,Λ}$-process. The dual process of the $C_N^{c,Λ}$-process is a spatial coalescent with multi-level block coalescence. For the above system we carry out a full renormalisation analysis in the hierarchical mean-field limit $N\to\infty$. Our main result is that, in the limit as $N\to\infty$, on each scale $k\in\mathbb{N}_0$ the $k$-block averages of the $C_N^{c,Λ}$-process converge to a random process that is a superposition of a $C^{Λ_k}$-process and a Fleming-Viot process, the latter with a volatility $d_k$ and with a drift of strength $c_k$ towards the limiting $(k+1)$-block average. It turns out that $d_k$ is a function of $c_l$ and $Λ_l$ for all $0\leq l<k$. Thus, it is through the volatility that the renormalisation manifests itself. We discuss the implications of the scaling of $d_k$ for the behaviour on large space-time scales of the $C_N^{c,Λ}$-process. We compare the outcome with what is known from the renormalisation analysis of hierarchically interacting Fleming-Viot diffusions, pointing out several new features. We obtain a new classification for when the process exhibits clustering, respectively, exhibits local coexistence. Finally, we show that for finite $N$ the same dichotomy between clustering and local coexistence holds as for $N\to\infty$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.