Paper detail

Remodel the Envelope Around the 21 micrometer PPN IRAS 07134+1005

Recently, the CO J=3-2 observational result of the envelope of the 21 micrometer PPN IRAS 07134+1005 has been reported. Assuming that the CO J=3-2 line was optically thin, the mass-loss rate of the superwind in this PPN was found to be at least 2 orders of magnitude lower than the typical range. In order to obtain a more accurate mass-loss rate, we reexamine this data and construct a radiative transfer model to compare with the data. Also, in order to better resolve the superwind, we adopt a different weighting on the data to obtain maps at higher resolution. Our result shows that the CO J=3-2 emission is located slightly further away from the central source than the mid-IR emission, probably because that the material is cooler in the outer part and thus better traced by the CO emission. At lower resolution, however, the CO emission appeared to be spatially coincident with the mid-IR emission. Our model has two components, an inner ellipsoidal shell-like superwind with an equatorial density enhancement and an outer spheroidal AGB wind. The thick torus in previous model could be considered as the dense equatorial part of our ellipsoidal superwind. With radiative transfer, our model reproduces more observed features than previous model and obtains an averaged superwind mass-loss rate of ~ 1.8 x 10^-5 solar mass per year, which is typical for a superwind. The mass-loss rate in the equatorial plane is 3 x 10^-5 solar mass per year, also the same as that derived before from modeling CO J=1-0 emission.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.