Paper detail

Remez-Type Inequality for Smooth Functions

The classical Remez inequality bounds the maximum of the absolute value of a polynomial $P(x)$ of degree $d$ on $[-1,1]$ through the maximum of its absolute value on any subset $Z$ of positive measure in $[-1,1]$. Similarly, in several variables the maximum of the absolute value of a polynomial $P(x)$ of degree $d$ on the unit ball $B^n \subset {\mathbb R}^n$ can be bounded through the maximum of its absolute value on any subset $Z\subset Q^n_1$ of positive $n$-measure $m_n(Z)$. In \cite{Yom} a stronger version of Remez inequality was obtained: the Lebesgue $n$-measure $m_n$ was replaced by a certain geometric quantity $ω_{n,d}(Z)$ satisfying $ω_{n,d}(Z)\geq m_n(Z)$ for any measurable $Z$. The quantity $ω_{n,d}(Z)$ can be effectively estimated in terms of the metric entropy of $Z$ and it may be nonzero for discrete and even finite sets $Z$. In the present paper we extend Remez inequality to functions of finite smoothness. This is done by combining the result of \cite{Yom} with the Taylor polynomial approximation of smooth functions. As a consequence we obtain explicit lower bounds in some examples in the Whitney problem of a $C^k$-smooth extrapolation from a given set $Z$, in terms of the geometry of $Z$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.