Paper detail

Remarks on the Graovac-Ghorbani index of bipartite graphs

The atom-bond connectivity (ABC) index is a well-known degree-based molecular structure descriptor with a variety of chemical applications. In 2010 Graovac and Ghorbani introduced a distance-based analog of this index, the Graovac-Ghorbani (GG) index, which yielded promising results when compared to analogous descriptors. In this paper, we investigate the structure of graphs that maximize and minimize the GG index. Specifically, we show that amongst all bipartite graphs, the minimum GG index is attained by a complete bipartite graph, while the maximum GG index is attained by a path or a cycle-like graph; the structure of the resulting graph depends on the number of vertices. Through the course of the research, we also derive an asymptotic estimate of the GG index of paths. In order to obtain our results, we introduce a normalized version of the GG index and call it the normalized Graovac-Ghorbani (NGG) index. Finally, we discuss some related open questions as a potential extension of our work.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.