Paper detail

Remarks on relativistic scalar models with chemical potential

We discuss selected aspects of classical relativistic scalar field theories with nonzero chemical potential. First, we offer a review of classical field theory at nonzero density within the Lagrangian formalism. The aspects covered include the question of equivalence of descriptions of finite-density states using a chemical potential or time-dependent field configurations, the choice of Hamiltonian whose minimization yields the finite-density equilibrium state, and the issue of breaking of Lorentz invariance. Second, we demonstrate how the low-energy effective field theory for Nambu-Goldstone (NG) modes arising from the spontaneous breakdown of global internal symmetries can be worked out explicitly by integrating out the heavy (Higgs) fields. This makes it possible to analyze the spectrum of NG modes and their interactions without having to deal with mixing of NG and Higgs fields, ubiquitous in the linear-sigma-model description of spontaneous symmetry breaking.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.