Paper detail

Remarks on distinguishability of Schwarzschild spacetime and thermal Minkowski spacetime using Resonance Casimir-Polder interaction

One perceives same response of a single-atom detector when placed at a point outside the horizon in Schwarzschild spacetime to that of a static single-atom detector in thermal Minkowski spacetime. So one cannot distinguish Schwarzschild spacetime from thermal Minkowski spacetime by using a single-atom detector. We show that, for Schwarzschild spacetime, beyond a characteristic length scale which is proportional to the inverse of the surface gravity $κ$, the \emph{Resonance Casimir-Polder interaction (RCPI)} between two entangled atoms is characterized by a $1/L^2$ power-law provided the atoms are located close to the horizon. However, the \emph{RCPI} between two entangled atoms follows a $1/L$ power-law decay for the thermal Minkowski spacetime. Seemingly, it appears that the spacetimes can be distinguished from each other using the \emph{RCPI} behavior. But our further exploration leads to the conclusion that the length scale limit beyond a characteristic value is not compatible with the local flatness of the spacetime.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.