Paper detail

RELICS: Spectroscopy of gravitationally-lensed $z\simeq 2$ reionization-era analogs and implications for CIII] detections at $z>6$

Recent observations have revealed the presence of strong CIII] emission (EW$_{\rm{CIII]}}>20$ Å) in $z>6$ galaxies, the origin of which remains unclear. In an effort to understand the nature of these line emitters, we have initiated a survey targeting CIII] emission in gravitationally-lensed reionization era analogs identified in HST imaging of clusters from the RELICS survey. Here we report initial results on four galaxies selected to have low stellar masses (2-8$\times$10$^7$ M$_\odot$) and J$_{125}$-band flux excesses indicative of intense [OIII]+H$β$ emission (EW$_{\rm{[OIII]+Hβ}}$=500-2000 Å), similar to what has been observed at $z>6$. We detect CIII] emission in three of the four sources, with the CIII] EW reaching values seen in the reionization era (EW$_{\rm{CIII]}}\simeq 17-22$ Å) in the two sources with the strongest optical line emission (EW$_{\rm{[OIII]+Hβ}}\simeq 2000$ Å). We have obtained a Magellan/FIRE near-infrared spectrum of the strongest CIII] emitter in our sample, revealing gas that is both metal poor and highly ionized. Using photoionization models, we are able to simultaneously reproduce the intense CIII] and optical line emission for extremely young (2-3 Myr) and metal poor (0.06-0.08 Z$_\odot$) stellar populations, as would be expected after a substantial upturn in the SFR of a low mass galaxy. The sources in this survey are among the first for which CIII] has been used as the primary means of redshift confirmation. We suggest that it should be possible to extend this approach to $z>6$ with current facilities, using CIII] to measure redshifts of objects with IRAC excesses indicating EW$_{\rm{[OIII]+Hβ}}\simeq 2000$ Å, providing a method of spectroscopic confirmation independent of Ly$α$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access20 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.