Paper detail

Reliable scaling of Position Weight Matrices for binding strength comparisons between transcription factors

Scoring DNA sequences against Position Weight Matrices (PWMs) is a widely adopted method to identify putative transcription factor binding sites. While common bioinformatics tools produce scores that can reflect the binding strength between a specific transcription factor and the DNA, these scores are not directly comparable between different transcription factors. Here, we provide two different ways to find the scaling parameter $λ$ that allows us to infer binding energy from a PWM score. The first approach uses a PWM and background genomic sequence as input to estimate $λ$ for a specific transcription factor, which we applied to show that $λ$ distributions for different transcription factor families correspond with their DNA binding properties. Our second method can reliably convert $λ$ between different PWMs of the same transcription factor, which allows us to directly compare PWMs that were generated by different approaches. These two approaches provide consistent and computationally efficient ways to scale PWMs scores and estimate transcription factor binding sites strength.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.