Paper detail

Reliable Deniable Communication: Hiding Messages in Noise

A transmitter Alice may wish to reliably transmit a message to a receiver Bob over a binary symmetric channel (BSC), while simultaneously ensuring that her transmission is deniable from an eavesdropper Willie. That is, if Willie listening to Alice's transmissions over a "significantly noisier" BSC than the one to Bob, he should be unable to estimate even whether Alice is transmitting. We consider two scenarios. In our first scenario, we assume that the channel transition probability from Alice to Bob and Willie is perfectly known to all parties. Here, even when Alice's (potential) communication scheme is publicly known to Willie (with no common randomness between Alice and Bob), we prove that over 'n' channel uses Alice can transmit a message of length O(sqrt{n}) bits to Bob, deniably from Willie. We also prove information-theoretic order-optimality of this result. In our second scenario, we allow uncertainty in the knowledge of the channel transition probability parameters. In particular, we assume that the channel transition probabilities for both Bob and Willie are uniformly drawn from a known interval. Here, we show that, in contrast to the previous setting, Alice can communicate O(n) bits of message reliably and deniably (again, with no common randomness). We give both an achievability result and a matching converse for this setting. Our work builds upon the work of Bash et al on AWGN channels (but with common randomness) and differs from other recent works (by Wang et al and Bloch) in two important ways - firstly our deniability metric is variational distance (as opposed to Kullback-Leibler divergence), and secondly, our techniques are significantly different from these works.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.