Paper detail

Reliability of the local truncations for the random tensor models renormalization group flow

The standard nonperturbative approaches of renormalization group for tensor models are generally focused on a purely local potential approximation (i.e. involving only generalized traces and product of them) and are showed to strongly violate the modified Ward identities. This paper as a continuation of our recent contribution [Physical Review D 101, 106015 (2020)], intended to investigate the approximation schemes compatibles with Ward identities and constraints between $2n$-points observables in the large $N$-limit. We consider separately two different approximations: In the first one, we try to construct a local potential approximation from a slight modification of the Litim regulator, so that it remains optimal in the usual sense, and preserves the boundary conditions in deep UV and deep IR limits. In the second one, we introduce derivative couplings in the truncations and show that the compatibility with Ward identities implies strong relations between $β$-functions, allowing to close the infinite hierarchy of flow equations in the non-branching sector, up to a given order in the derivative expansion. Finally, using exact relation between correlations functions in large $N$-limit, we show that strictly local truncations are insufficient to reach the exact value for the critical exponent, highlighting the role played by these strong relations between observables taking into account the behavior of the flow; and the role played by the multi-trace operators, discussed in the two different approximation schemes. In both cases, we compare our conclusions to the results obtained in the literature and conclude that, at a given order, taking into account the exact functional relations between observables like Ward identities in a systematic way we can strongly improve the physical relevance of the approximation for exact RG equation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.