Paper detail

Reliability of COVID-19 data and government policies

We study how available data on COVID-19 cases and deaths in different countries are reliable. Our analysis is based on a modification of the law of anomalous numbers, the Newcomb-Benford law, applied to the daily number of deaths and new cases in each country. We first revisit the Newcomb-Benford law and show how to avoid false negative compliance of the data. We then compared deviation from this law, to a number of social and economic indices for each country by computing the Spearman rank order correlation between each index and the \c{hi}2 deviation of COVID- 19 data to the modified NB law. A similar analysis for excess deaths for the same countries with sufficient available data was performed. We conclude that in general less democratic, less transparent and more corrupt countries tend to have data of lesser quality. We also discuss the limitations of the present approach.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.