Paper detail

Relaxed constant positive linear dependence constraint qualification and its application to bilevel programs

Relaxed constant positive linear dependence constraint qualification (RCPLD) for a system of smooth equalities and inequalities is a constraint qualification that is weaker than the usual constraint qualifications such as Mangasarian Fromovitz constraint qualification and the linear constraint qualification. Moreover RCPLD is known to induce an error bound property. In this paper we extend RCPLD to a very general feasibility system which may include Lipschitz continuous inequality constraints, complementarity constraints and abstract constraints. We show that this RCPLD for the general system is a constraint qualification for the optimality condition in terms of limiting subdifferential and limiting normal cone and it is a sufficient condition for the error bound property under the strict complementarity condition for the complementarity system and Clarke regularity conditions for the inequality constraints and the abstract constraint set. Moreover we introduce and study some sufficient conditions for RCPLD including the relaxed constant rank constraint qualification (RCRCQ). Finally we apply our results to the bilevel program.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.