Paper detail

Relaxation volumes of microscopic and mesoscopic irradiation-induced defects in tungsten

The low energy structures of irradiation-induced defects have been studied in detail, as these determine the available modes by which a defect can diffuse or relax. As a result, there are many studies concerning the relative energies of possible defect structures, and empirical potentials are commonly fitted to or evaluated with respect to these energies. But recently [Dudarev et al Nuclear Fusion 2018], we have shown how to determine the stresses, strains and swelling of reactor components under irradiation from the elastic properties of ensembles of irradiation-induced defects. These elastic properties have received comparatively little attention. Here we evaluate relaxation volumes of irradiation-induced defects in tungsten computed with empirical potentials, and compare to density functional theory results where available. Different empirical potentials give different results, but some potential-independent trends in relaxation volumes can be identified. We show that the relaxation volume of small defects can be predicted to within 10% from their point-defect count. For larger defects we provide empirical fits for the relaxation volume of as a function of size. We demonstrate that the relaxation volume associated with a single primary-damage cascade can be estimated from the primary knock-on atom (PKA) energy. We conclude that while annihilation of vacancy- and interstitial- character defects will invariably reduce the total relaxation volume of the cascade debris, empirical potentials disagree whether coalescence of defects will reduce or increase the total relaxation volume.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.