Paper detail

Relaxation Time and Dissipation Interaction in Hot Planet Atmospheric Flow Simulations

We elucidate the interplay between Newtonian thermal relaxation and numerical dissipation, of several different origins, in flow simulations of hot extrasolar planet atmospheres. Currently, a large range of Newtonian relaxation, or "cooling", times (~10 days to ~1 hour) is used among different models and within a single model over the model domain. In this study we demonstrate that a short relaxation time (much less than the planetary rotation time) leads to a large amount of unphysical, grid-scale oscillations that contaminate the flow field. These oscillations force the use of an excessive amount of artificial viscosity to quench them and prevent the simulation from "blowing up". Even if the blow-up is prevented, such simulations can be highly inaccurate because they are either severely over-dissipated or under-dissipated, and are best discarded in these cases. Other numerical stability and timestep size enhancers (e.g., Robert-Asselin filter or semi-implicit time-marching schemes) also produce similar, but less excessive, damping. We present diagnostics procedures to choose the "optimal" simulation and discuss implications of our findings for modeling hot extrasolar planet atmospheres.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.