Paper detail

Relativistic $<σv_\text{rel}>$ in the calculation of relics abundances: a closer look

In this paper we clarify the relation between the invariant relativistic relative velocity $V_\text{r}$, the Møller velocity $\bar{v}$, and the non-relativistic relative velocity $v_r$. Adopting $V_{\text{r}}$ as the true physical relative velocity for pair-collisions in a non-degenerate relativistic gas, we show that in the frame co-moving with the gas (i) the thermally averaged cross section times relative velocity $<σv_\text{rel}>$ that appears in the density evolution equation for thermal relics is reformulated only in terms of $V_\text{r}$ and $\mathcal{P}(V_{\text{r}})$ in a manifestly Lorentz invariant form; (ii) the frame-dependent issues of the standard formulation in terms of the Møller velocity, as well as "superluminal" relative velocities, are not present in this formulation. Furthermore, considering the annihilation of dark matter into a particle-antiparticle pair $f\bar{f}$, in the cases $m_f=0$, $m_f=m$ and $m_f \gg m$, we find that the coefficients of the low velocity expansion of $<σV_{\text{r}}>$ admit an exact analytical representation in terms of the Meijer $G$ functions that can be reduced to combinations of modified Bessel functions of the second kind.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.