Paper detail

Relativistic spin-precession in binary pulsars

After the first prediction to expect geodetic precession in binary pulsars in 1974, made immediately after the discovery of a pulsar with a companion, the effects of relativistic spin precession have now been detected in all binary systems where the magnitude of the precession rate is expected to be sufficiently high. Moreover, the first quantitative test leads to the only available constraints for spin-orbit coupling of a strongly self-gravitating body for general relativity (GR) and alternative theories of gravity. The current results are consistent with the predictions of GR, proving the effacement principle of spinning bodies. Beyond tests of theories of gravity, relativistic spin precession has also become a useful tool to perform beam tomography of the pulsar emission beam, allowing to infer the unknown beam structure, and to probe the physics of the core collapse of massive stars.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.