Paper detail

Relativistic MOND theory based on the Khronon scalar field

We investigate a model of modified gravity recovering the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) in the non-relativistic limit, based on the introduction of a preferred time foliation violating Lorentz invariance in the weak-field regime. Lorentz-invariance violation has been studied in the framework of Einstein-aether theory, the generalization of which, known as non-canonical Einstein-aether theory, having been proposed as a relativistic formulation of MOND. Our model can be seen as a minimal specialization to the hypersurface orthogonal case, which allows a different interpretation in terms of the preferred time : it can be either treated as a dynamical scalar field in a 4D formulation, or chosen as the time coordinate in a 3+1 formulation. We discuss the equivalence of the two points of view and the non-relativistic limit of the model.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.