Paper detail

Relativistic effects for the reaction Ubq + 6 CO = Ubq (CO)6 or Ubq (OC)6:Prediction of the existence, atomization energy, and isomerization energy of the isomers Ubq (CO)6 and Ubq (OC)6 of element Ubq ( Z=124, eka-uranium)

Our ab initio all-electron relativistic Dirac*Fock (DF) calculations for the octahedral (Oh) Ubq(CO)6 and Ubq(OC)6 predict atomization energies (Ae) of 50.25 (47.93) and 43.43 (44.88 ) eV, respectively where the corresponding non-relativistic calculated Ae's are given in parenthesis. Our calculated DF and NR isomerization energies (E iso) for Ubq (CO) 6 = Ubq (OC) 6 are 6.83 and 3.05 eV, respectively. Our calculated DF (NR) energy for the reaction Ubq + 6CO = Ubq (CO)6 is -4.31 (-4.30) eV, while the energy of the isomeric reaction Ubq + 6CO = Ubq(OC)6 is 2.52 ( -1.25 ) eV, respectively. The relativistic effects increase the Eiso of Ubq (CO)6 by ~3.78 eV , decrease the Ubq-C bond distance by 0.12 angstroms and have a negligible effect on the C-O bond distance as expected. These are the first results of relativistic effects for isomerztion energy and atomization energy of the superheavy Ubq (CO)6 and Ubq(OC)6. The bond distances Ubq-C and Ubq-O optimized at the DF level of theory for Ubq(CO)6 and Ubq(OC)6 are 2.572 and 2.559 angstroms, while the corresponding optimized bond distances Ubq-C and Ubq-O at the NR level of theory are 2.691 and 3.616 angstroms, respectively. Both our DF and NR calculations clearly predict the formation of both the isomers Ubq(CO)6 and Ubq(OC), and the former is predicted to be more stable at the DF level of theory by ~7 eV than the latter.No such calculations have been reported before for systems of such superheavy elements.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.