Paper detail

Relativistic description of the semileptonic decays of bottom mesons

The form factors of the semileptonic $B$, $B_s$ and $B_c$ meson decays are calculated in the framework of the relativistic quark model based on the quasipotential approach in QCD. They are expressed through the overlap integrals of the meson wave function. All relativistic effects are consistently taken into account. The momentum transfer $q^2$ behavior of form factors is determined in the whole accessible kinematical range. We do not use any extrapolations, heavy quark $1/m_Q$ expansion or model assumptions about the shape of form factors. Convenient analytic expressions of the form factors are given, which very accurately reproduce the numerical results of our calculation. On the basis of these form factors and helicity formalism, the differential and total branching fractions of various semileptonic decays of bottom meson are calculated. The mean values of the forward-backward asymmetry $\langle A_{FB}\rangle$, lepton-side convexity parameter $\langle C^\ell_{F}\rangle$, longitudinal $\langle P^\ell_{L}\rangle$ and transverse $\langle P^\ell_{T}\rangle$ polarization of the charged lepton, and the longitudinal polarization fraction $\langle F_{L}\rangle$ for final-state vector meson are also evaluated. We present a detailed comparison of the obtained predictions with the calculations based on the covariant light-front quark model and confront them to available lattice QCD and experimental data. It is found that although both models predict close values of the total branching fractions, the differential distributions and forward-backward asymmetry and polarization parameters differ significantly, especially for the heavy-to-light semileptonic decays. We identify observables which measurement can help to discriminate between models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.