Relativistic compact stars in the Kuchowicz spacetime

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present an anisotropic charged analogue of Kuchowicz (1971) solution of the general relativistic field equations in curvature coordinates by using simple form of electric intensity EE and pressure anisotropy factor ΔΔ that involve charge parameter KK and anisotropy parameter αα respectively. Our solution is well behaved in all respects for all values of XX ( XX is related to the radius of the star ) lying in the range 0<X≤0.60< X \le 0.6, αα lying in the range 0≤α≤1.30 \le α\le 1.3, KK lying in the range 0<K≤1.750< K \le 1.75 and Schwarzschild compactness parameter "uu" lying in the range 0<u≤0.3380< u \le 0.338. Since our solution is well behaved for a wide range of the parameters, we can model many different types of ultra-cold compact stars like quark stars and neutron stars. We present some models of super dense quark stars and neutron stars corresponding to X=0.2, α=0.2X=0.2,~α=0.2 and K=0.5K=0.5 for which umax=0.15u_{max}=0.15. By assuming surface density ρb=4.6888×1014 g/ccρ_b=4.6888\times 10^{14}~ g/cc the mass and radius are 0.955M⊙0.955 M_\odot and 9.439km9.439 km respectively. For ρb=2.7×1014 g/ccρ_b=2.7\times 10^{14}~ g/cc the mass and radius are 1.259M⊙1.259 M_\odot and 12.439km12.439 km respectively and for ρb=2×1014 g/ccρ_b=2\times 10^{14}~ g/cc the mass and radius are 1.463M⊙1.463 M_\odot and 14.453km14.453 km respectively. It is also shown that inclusion of more electric charge and anisotropy enhances the static stable configuration under radial perturbations. The M−RM-R graph suggests that the maximum mass of the configuration depends on the surface density {\bf i.e. with the increase of surface density} the maximum mass and corresponding radius decrease. This may be because of existence of exotic matters at higher densities that soften the EoSs.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.