Paper detail

Relativistic chiral representation of the πN scattering amplitude

We have analyzed pion-nucleon scattering using the manifestly relativistic covariant frameworks of Infrared Regularization (IR) and Extended-On-Mass-Shell (EOMS) up to O(q^3) in the chiral expansion, where q is a generic small momentum. We describe the low-energy phase shifts with a similar quality as previously achieved with Heavy Baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory, being the EOMS description better than the IR one. The Goldberger-Treiman discrepancy is extracted from data of partial wave analyses using both schemes, obtaining an unacceptable large value for the case of IR due to the loop contribution. On the other hand, EOMS gives small values compatible with other phenomenological approaches. Finally, we have unitarized the amplitudes provided by both schemes to extend the range of our description obtaining a good agreement with the data up to energies of \sqrt{s}\approx 1.3 GeV for the EOMS scheme while IR can not go beyond energies of \sqrt{s}\approx 1.25 GeV due to the unphysical cut that this scheme introduces.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.