Paper detail

Relative Geodesics in the Special Euclidean Group

We propose a notion of distance between two parametrized planar curves, called their discrepancy, and defined intuitively as the minimal amount of deformation needed to deform the source curve into the target curve. A precise definition of discrepancy is given as follows. A curve of transformations in the special Euclidean group SE(2) is said to be admissible if it maps the source curve to the target curve under the point-wise action of SE(2) on the plane. After endowing the group SE(2) with a left-invariant metric, we define a relative geodesic in SE(2) to be a critical point of the energy functional associated to the metric, over all admissible curves. The discrepancy is then defined as the value of the energy of the minimizing relative geodesic. In the first part of the paper, we derive a scalar ODE which is a necessary condition for a curve in SE(2) to be a relative geodesic, and we discuss some of the properties of the discrepancy. In the second part of the paper, we consider discrete curves, and by means of a variational principle, we derive a system of discrete equations for the relative geodesics. We finish with several examples.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.