Paper detail

Relative Canonical Network Ensembles -- (Mis)characterizing Small-World Networks

What do generic networks that have certain properties look like? We define Relative Canonical Network ensembles as the ensembles that realize a property R while being as indistinguishable as possible from a generic network ensemble. This allows us to study the most generic features of the networks giving rise to the property under investigation. To test the approach we apply it first to the network measure "small-world-ness", thought to characterize small-world networks. We find several phase transitions as we go to less and less generic networks in which cliques and hubs emerge. Such features are not shared by typical small-world networks, showing that high "small-world-ness" does not characterize small-world networks as they are commonly understood. On the other hand we see that for embedded networks, the average shortest path length and total Euclidean link length are better at characterizing small-world networks, with hubs that emerge as a defining feature at low genericity. We expect the overall approach to have wide applicability for understanding network properties of real world interest.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.