Paper detail

Relations enumerable from positive information

We study countable structures from the viewpoint of enumeration reducibility. Since enumeration reducibility is based on only positive information, in this setting it is natural to consider structures given by their positive atomic diagram -- the computable join of all relations of the structure. Fixing a structure $\mathcal{A}$, a natural class of relations in this setting are the relations $R$ such that $R^{\hat{\mathcal{A}}}$ is enumeration reducible to the positive atomic diagram of $\hat{\mathcal{A}}$ for every $\hat{ \mathcal{A}}\cong \mathcal{A}$ -- the relatively intrinsically positively enumerable (r.i.p.e.) relations. We show that the r.i.p.e. relations are exactly the relations that are definable by $Σ^p_1$ formulas, a subclass of the infinitary $Σ^0_1$ formulas. We then introduce a new natural notion of the jump of a structure and study its interaction with other notions of jumps. At last we show that positively enumerable functors, a notion studied by Csima, Rossegger, and Yu, are equivalent to a notion of interpretability using $Σ^p_1$ formulas.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.