Paper detail

Relations between dynamical degrees, Weil's Riemann hypothesis and the standard conjectures

Let $\mathbb{K}$ be an algebraically closed field, $X$ a smooth projective variety over $\mathbb{K}$ and $f:X\rightarrow X$ a dominant regular morphism. Let $N^i(X)$ be the group of algebraic cycles modulo numerical equivalence. Let $χ(f)$ be the spectral radius of the pullback $f^*:H^*(X,\mathbb{Q}_l)\rightarrow H^*(X,\mathbb{Q}_l)$ on $l$-adic cohomology groups, and $λ(f)$ the spectral radius of the pullback $f^*:N^*(X)\rightarrow N^*(X)$. We prove in this paper, by using consequences of Deligne's proof of Weil's Riemann hypothesis, that $χ(f)=λ(f)$. This answers affirmatively a question posed by Esnault and Srinivas. Consequently, the algebraic entropy $\log χ(f)$ of an endomorphism is both a birational invariant and étale invariant. More general results are proven if either $\mathbb{K}=\overline{\mathbb{F}_p}$ or the Fundamental Conjecture D (numerical equivalence vs homological equivalence) holds. Among other results in the paper, we show that if some properties of dynamical degrees, known in the case $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{C}$, hold in positive characteristics, then simple proofs of Weil's Riemann hypothesis follow.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.