Paper detail

Relating an entanglement measure with statistical correlators for two-qudit mixed states using only a pair of complementary observables

We focus on characterizing entanglement of high dimensional bipartite states using various statistical correlators for two-qudit mixed states. The salient results obtained are as follows: (a) A scheme for determining the entanglement measure given by Negativity is explored by analytically relating it to the widely used statistical correlators viz. mutual predictability, mutual information and Pearson Correlation coefficient for different types of bipartite arbitrary dimensional mixed states. Importantly, this is demonstrated using only a pair of complementary observables pertaining to the mutually unbiased bases. (b) The relations thus derived provide the separability bounds for detecting entanglement obtained for a fixed choice of the complementary observables, while the bounds per se are state-dependent. Such bounds are compared with the earlier suggested separability bounds. (c) We also show how these statistical correlators can enable distinguishing between the separable, distillable and bound entanglement domains of the one-parameter Horodecki two-qutrit states. Further, the relations linking Negativity with the statistical correlators have been derived for such Horodecki states in the domain of distillable entanglement. Thus, this entanglement characterisation scheme based on statistical correlators and harnessing complementarity of the obsevables opens up a potentially rich direction of study which is applicable for both distillable and bound entangled states.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.