Paper detail

Reionization constraints using Principal Component Analysis

Using a semi-analytical model developed by Choudhury & Ferrara (2005) we study the observational constraints on reionization via a principal component analysis (PCA). Assuming that reionization at z>6 is primarily driven by stellar sources, we decompose the unknown function N_{ion}(z), representing the number of photons in the IGM per baryon in collapsed objects, into its principal components and constrain the latter using the photoionization rate obtained from Ly-alpha forest Gunn-Peterson optical depth, the WMAP7 electron scattering optical depth and the redshift distribution of Lyman-limit systems at z \sim 3.5. The main findings of our analysis are: (i) It is sufficient to model N_{ion}(z) over the redshift range 2<z<14 using 5 parameters to extract the maximum information contained within the data. (ii) All quantities related to reionization can be severely constrained for z<6 because of a large number of data points whereas constraints at z>6 are relatively loose. (iii) The weak constraints on N_{ion}(z) at z>6 do not allow to disentangle different feedback models with present data. There is a clear indication that N_{ion}(z) must increase at z>6, thus ruling out reionization by a single stellar population with non-evolving IMF, and/or star-forming efficiency, and/or photon escape fraction. The data allows for non-monotonic N_{ion}(z) which may contain sharp features around z \sim 7. (iv) The PCA implies that reionization must be 99% completed between 5.8<z<10.3 (95% confidence level) and is expected to be 50% complete at z \approx 9.5-12. With future data sets, like those obtained by Planck, the z>6 constraints will be significantly improved.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.