Paper detail

Reinterpretion of Experimental Results with Basis Templates

Experimental analysis of data from particle collisions is typically expressed as statistical limits on a few benchmark models of particular, often historical, interest. The implications of the data for other theoretical models (current or future) may be powerful, but they cannot typically be calculated from the published information, except in the simplest case of a single-bin counting experiment. We present a novel solution to this long-standing problem by expressing the new model as a linear combination of models from published experimental analysis, allowing for the trivial calculation of limits on a nearly arbitrary model. We present tests in simple toy experiments, demonstrate self-consistency by using published results to reproduce other published results on the same spectrum, and provide a reinterpretation of a search for chiral down-type heavy quarks ($b'$) in terms of a search for an exotic heavy quark ($T$) with similar but distinct phenomenology. We find $m_T>419$ GeV at 95% CL, currently the strongest limits if the $T$ quark decays via $T\rightarrow Wb, T\rightarrow tZ$ and $T\rightarrow tH$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.