Paper detail

Reinstating the M31 X-ray system RX J0042.3+4115 as a black hole X-ray binary, and compelling evidence for an extended corona

The M31 X-ray source RX J0042.3+4115 was originally identified as a black hole binary because it displayed characteristic low state variability at conspicuously high luminosities; unfortunately, this variability was later found to be artificial. However, analysis of 84 Chandra ACIS observations, an HST ACS/WFC observation, and a 60 ks XMM-Newton observation has supplied new evidence that RX J0042.3+4115 is indeed a black hole binary. The brightest optical star within 3 sigma of the position of RX J0042.3+4115 had a F435W (~B) magnitude of 25.4+/-0.2; M_B > -0.4, hence we find a low mass donor likely. RX J0042.3+4115 was persistently bright over ~12 years. Spectral fits revealed characteristic black hole binary states: a low/hard state at 2.08+/-0.08 E+38 erg/s, and a steep power law state at 2.41+/-0.05 E+38 erg/s (0.3--10 keV). The high luminosity low state suggests a ~20 M_Sun primary; this is high, but within the range of known stellar black hole masses. The inner disk temperature during the steep power law state is 2.24$\pm$0.15 keV, high but strikingly similar to that of GRS 1915+105, the only known Galactic black hole binary with a low mass donor t o be persistently bright. Therefore RX J0042.3+4115 may be an analog for GRS 1915+105; however, other mechanisms may account for its behavior. We find compelling evidence for an extended corona during the steep power law state, because compact corona models where the seed photons for Comptonization are tied to the inner disc temperature are rejected.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.