Paper detail

Reilly's type inequality for the Laplacian associated to a density related with shrinkers for MCF

Let $(\bar{M},<,>,e^ψ)$ be a Riemannian manifold with a density, and let $M$ be a closed $n$-dimensional submanifold of $\bar{M}$ with the induced metric and density. We give an upper bound on the first eigenvalue $λ_1$ of the closed eigenvalue problem for $Δ_ψ$ (the Laplacian on $M$ associated to the density) in terms of the average of the norm of the vector ${\vec{H}}_{ψ} + {\bar \nabla}$ with respect to the volume form induced by the density, where ${\vec{H}}_{ψ}$ is the mean curvature of $M$ associated to the density $e^ψ$. When $\bar{M}=\Bbb R^{n+k}$ or $\bar{M}=S^{n+k-1}$, the equality between $λ_1$ and its bound implies that $e^ψ$ is a Gaussian density ($ψ(x) = \frac{C}{2} |x|^2$, $C<0$), and $M$ is a shrinker for the mean curvature flow (MCF) on $\Bbb R^{n+k}$. We prove also that $λ_1 =-C$ on the standard shrinker torus of revolution. Based on this and on the Yau's conjecture on the first eigenvalue of minimal submanifolds of $S^n$, we conjecture that the equality $λ_1=-C$ is true for all the shrinkers of MCF in $\mathbb{R}^{n+k}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.