Abstract

Evidence from the BICEP2 experiment for a significant gravitational-wave background has focussed attention on inflaton potentials V(ϕ)∝ϕαV(ϕ) \propto ϕ^α with α=2α=2 ("chaotic" or "m2ϕ2m^2ϕ^2" inflation) or with smaller values of αα, as may arise in axion-monodromy models. Here we show that reheating considerations may provide additional constraints to these models. The reheating phase preceding the radiation era is modeled by an effective equation-of-state parameter wrew_{\rm re}. The canonical reheating scenario is then described by wre=0w_{\rm re}=0. The simplest α=2α=2 models are consistent with wre=0w_{\rm re} = 0 for values of nsn_s well within the current 1σ1σ range. Models with α=1α=1 or α=2/3α=2/3 require a more exotic reheating phase, with −1/3<wre<0-1/3<w_{\rm re}<0, unless nsn_s falls above the current 1σ1σ range. Likewise, models with α=4α=4 require a physically implausible wre>1/3w_{\rm re}>1/3, unless nsn_s is close to the lower limit of the 2σ2σ range. For m2ϕ2m^2ϕ^2 inflation and canonical reheating as a benchmark, we derive a relation log⁡10(Tre/106 GeV)≃2000 (ns−0.96)\log_{10}\left(T_{\rm re}/10^6\,{\rm GeV} \right) \simeq 2000\,(n_s-0.96) between the reheat temperature TreT_{\rm re} and the scalar spectral index nsn_s. Thus, if nsn_s is close to its central value, then Tre≲106T_{\rm re}\lesssim 10^6~GeV, just above the electroweak scale. If the reheat temperature is higher, as many theorists may prefer, then the scalar spectral index should be closer to ns≃0.965n_s\simeq0.965 (at the pivot scale k=0.05 Mpc−1k=0.05\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}), near the upper limit of the 1σ1σ error range. Improved precision in the measurement of nsn_s should allow m2ϕ2m^2ϕ^2, axion-monodromy, and ϕ4ϕ^4 models to be distinguished, even without precise measurement of rr, and to test the m2ϕ2m^2ϕ^2 expectation of ns≃0.965n_s\simeq0.965.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.