Paper detail

Reheating constraints to inflationary models

Evidence from the BICEP2 experiment for a significant gravitational-wave background has focussed attention on inflaton potentials $V(ϕ) \propto ϕ^α$ with $α=2$ ("chaotic" or "$m^2ϕ^2$" inflation) or with smaller values of $α$, as may arise in axion-monodromy models. Here we show that reheating considerations may provide additional constraints to these models. The reheating phase preceding the radiation era is modeled by an effective equation-of-state parameter $w_{\rm re}$. The canonical reheating scenario is then described by $w_{\rm re}=0$. The simplest $α=2$ models are consistent with $w_{\rm re} = 0$ for values of $n_s$ well within the current $1σ$ range. Models with $α=1$ or $α=2/3$ require a more exotic reheating phase, with $-1/3<w_{\rm re}<0$, unless $n_s$ falls above the current $1σ$ range. Likewise, models with $α=4$ require a physically implausible $w_{\rm re}>1/3$, unless $n_s$ is close to the lower limit of the $2σ$ range. For $m^2ϕ^2$ inflation and canonical reheating as a benchmark, we derive a relation $\log_{10}\left(T_{\rm re}/10^6\,{\rm GeV} \right) \simeq 2000\,(n_s-0.96)$ between the reheat temperature $T_{\rm re}$ and the scalar spectral index $n_s$. Thus, if $n_s$ is close to its central value, then $T_{\rm re}\lesssim 10^6$~GeV, just above the electroweak scale. If the reheat temperature is higher, as many theorists may prefer, then the scalar spectral index should be closer to $n_s\simeq0.965$ (at the pivot scale $k=0.05\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$), near the upper limit of the $1σ$ error range. Improved precision in the measurement of $n_s$ should allow $m^2ϕ^2$, axion-monodromy, and $ϕ^4$ models to be distinguished, even without precise measurement of $r$, and to test the $m^2ϕ^2$ expectation of $n_s\simeq0.965$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.