Paper detail

Reheating constraints on modified single-field Natural Inflation models

In this paper, we discuss three modified single-field natural inflation models in detail, including Special generalized Natural Inflation model(SNI), Extended Natural Inflation model(ENI) and Natural Inflation inspired model(NII). We derive the analytical expression of the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ and the spectral index $n_s$ for those models. Then the reheating temperature $T_{re}$ and reheating duration $N_{re}$ are analytically derived. Moreover, considering the CMB constraints, the feasible space of the SNI model in $(n_s, r)$ plane is almost covered by that of the NII, which means the NII is more general than the SNI. In addition, there is no overlapping space between the ENI and the other two models in $(n_s, r)$ plane, which indicates that the ENI and the other two models exclude each other, and more accurate experiments can verify them. Furthermore, the reheating brings tighter constraints to the inflation models, but they still work for a different reheating universe. Considering the constraints of $n_s$, $r$, $N_k$ and choosing $T_{re}$ near the electroweak energy scale, one can find that the decay constants of the three models have no overlapping area and the effective equations of state $ω_{re}$ should be within $\frac{1}{4}\lesssim ω_{re} \lesssim \frac{4}{5}$ for the three models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.